Volume 23, Issue 2 (2020)
mjms 2020, 23(2): 101-107 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
heydari L, Agharahimi A, Anvari M, Halvaei I. Comparison of Survival Rate, Presence and Location of Meiotic Spindle after Vitrification of Mouse Oocytes between Open and Close Systems. mjms 2020; 23 (2) :101-107
URL: http://mjms.modares.ac.ir/article-30-40254-en.html
URL: http://mjms.modares.ac.ir/article-30-40254-en.html
1- Research and Clinical Center for Infertility, Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
2- Department of Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran , ihalvaei@modares.ac.ir
2- Department of Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran , ihalvaei@modares.ac.ir
Abstract: (1542 Views)
Aims: The present study aims to compare the survival rate, reconstitution and dislocation of meiotic spindle of mouse oocyte vitrification between open and close systems.
Materials & Methods: 131 matured oocytes (containing meiotic spindle) harvested from 6-8 week-old BALB/C and divided into two groups of open and close systems. After exposure of oocytes in vitrification media, oocytes were loaded on cryotop in open group and on Rapid-i in close group, and then vitrified. After warming, oocytes were incubated for 3 hours and evaluated for survival rate, presence and location of re-polymerized meiotic spindle by PolScope system.
Findings: Survival rate was significantly higher in open system compared to close system (91.1% vs 68.6%, respectively). 81.3% and 51.2% of survived oocyte contained meiotic spindle in close and open system, respectively (p<0.05). The percentage of nature location of meiotic spindle was more in close system, significantly.
Conclusion: Survival rate in open system is more than close system, but close system can preserve meiotic spindle and nature location better than open system. Also, it seems that the evaluation of meiotic spindle is essential for vitrified oocytes by PolScope system.
Materials & Methods: 131 matured oocytes (containing meiotic spindle) harvested from 6-8 week-old BALB/C and divided into two groups of open and close systems. After exposure of oocytes in vitrification media, oocytes were loaded on cryotop in open group and on Rapid-i in close group, and then vitrified. After warming, oocytes were incubated for 3 hours and evaluated for survival rate, presence and location of re-polymerized meiotic spindle by PolScope system.
Findings: Survival rate was significantly higher in open system compared to close system (91.1% vs 68.6%, respectively). 81.3% and 51.2% of survived oocyte contained meiotic spindle in close and open system, respectively (p<0.05). The percentage of nature location of meiotic spindle was more in close system, significantly.
Conclusion: Survival rate in open system is more than close system, but close system can preserve meiotic spindle and nature location better than open system. Also, it seems that the evaluation of meiotic spindle is essential for vitrified oocytes by PolScope system.
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Cellular Pathology
Received: 2020/02/2 | Accepted: 2020/07/21
Received: 2020/02/2 | Accepted: 2020/07/21
References
1. Robles V, G Valcarce D, F Riesco M. The use of antifreeze proteins in the cryopreservation of gametes and embryos. Biomolecules. 2019;9(5):181. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/biom9050181]
2. Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Kato O, Leibo SP. Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11(3):300-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60837-1]
3. Coello A, Pellicer A, Cobo A. Vitrification of human oocytes. Minerva Ginecologica. 2018;70(4):415-23. [Link]
4. Konc J, Kanyó K, Kriston R, Somoskői B, Cseh S. Cryopreservation of embryos and oocytes in human assisted reproduction. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:307268. [Link] [DOI:10.1155/2014/307268]
5. Stachecki JJ, Munné S, Cohen J. Spindle organization after cryopreservation of mouse, human, and bovine oocytes. Reprod BioMed Online. 2004;8(6):664-72. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61647-1]
6. Lim JM, Ko JJ, Hwang WS, Chung HM, Niwa K. Development of in vitro matured bovine oocytes after cryopreservation with different cryoprotectants. Theriogenology. 1999;51(7):1303-10. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00074-6]
7. Kuleshova L, Gianaroli L, Magli C, Ferraretti A, Trounson A. Birth following vitrification of a small number of human oocytes: Case report. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(12):3077-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/humrep/14.12.3077]
8. Edgar DH, Gook DA. A critical appraisal of cryopreservation (slow cooling versus vitrification) of human oocytes and embryos. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18(5):536-54. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/humupd/dms016]
9. Vazquez-Levin MH. A high-tech closer look to evaluate the impact of oocyte vitrification on embryo quality. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(3):448-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.07.1169]
10. Vajta G, Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM. Open versus closed systems for vitrification of human oocytes and embryos. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;30(4):325-33. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.12.012]
11. Bielanski A. A review of the risk of contamination of semen and embryos during cryopreservation and measures to limit cross-contamination during banking to prevent disease transmission in ET practices. Theriogenology. 2012;77(3):467-82. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.07.043]
12. Cobo A, Diaz C. Clinical application of oocyte vitrification: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(2):277-85. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.06.030]
13. Smith GD, Serafini PC, Fioravanti J, Yadid I, Coslovsky M, Hassun P, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(6):2088-95. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.065]
14. Castelló D, Cobo A, Mestres E, Garcia M, Vanrell I, Remohí JA, et al. Pre-clinical validation of a closed surface system (Cryotop SC) for the vitrification of oocytes and embryos in the mouse model. Cryobiology. 2018;81:107-16. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.cryobiol.2018.02.002]
15. Mullen SF, Rosenbaum M, Critser JK. The effect of osmotic stress on the cell volume, metaphase II spindle and developmental potential of in vitro matured porcine oocytes. Cryobiology. 2007;54(3):281-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.cryobiol.2007.03.005]
16. Huang JY, Chen HY, Park JY, Tan SL, Chian RC. Comparison of spindle and chromosome configuration in in vitro-and in vivo-matured mouse oocytes after vitrification. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(4):1424-32. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.07.1335]
17. Bonetti A, Cervi M, Tomei F, Marchini M, Ortolani F, Manno M. Ultrastructural evaluation of human metaphase II oocytes after vitrification: closed versus open devices. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(3):928-35. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.08.027]
18. Gutnisky C, Morado S, Gadze T, Donato A, Alvarez G, Dalvit G, et al. Morphological, biochemical and functional studies to evaluate bovine oocyte vitrification. Theriogenology. 2020;143:18-26. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.11.037]
19. Schoolcraft WB, Keller JL, Schlenker T. Excellent embryo quality obtained from vitrified oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19(6):820-3. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.09.017]
20. Larman MG. Appendix E: Rapid-i TM: Closed Vitrification Device by Vitrolife. In: Nagy ZP, Varghese AC, Agarwal A, editors. Cryopreservation of mammalian gametes and embryos. New York: Humana Press; 2017. pp. 335-42. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4939-6828-2_25]
21. De Munck N, Verheyen G, Van Landuyt L, Stoop D, Van De Velde H. Survival and post-warming in vitro competence of human oocytes after high security closed system vitrification. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30(3):361-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10815-013-9930-3]
22. Konc J, Kanyo K, Kriston R, Zeke J, Cseh S. Freezing of oocytes and its effect on the displacement of the meiotic spindle. Sci World J. 2012;2012:785421. [Link] [DOI:10.1100/2012/785421]
23. Świątecka J, Anchim T, Leśniewska M, Wołczyński S, Bielawski T, Milewski R. Oocyte zona pellucida and meiotic spindle birefringence as a biomarker of pregnancy rate outcome in IVF-ICSI treatment. Ginekologia Polska. 2014;85(4):264-271. [Link] [DOI:10.17772/gp/1722]
24. Tavukcuoglu S, Al-Azawi T, Khaki AA, Al-Hasani S. Is vitrification standard method of cryopreservation. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2012;17(3):152-6. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.mefs.2012.07.007]
25. Gook DA, Choo B, Bourne H, Lewis K, Edgar DH. Closed vitrification of human oocytes and blastocysts: Outcomes from a series of clinical cases. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33(9):1247-52. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10815-016-0748-7]
26. Talreja D, Gupta C, Pai H, Palshetkar N. Oocyte vitrification: A comparative analysis between fresh and cryopreserved oocytes in an oocyte donation program. Fertil Reprod. 2020;2(01):9-13. [Link] [DOI:10.1142/S2661318220500024]
27. Sun Y, Gu R, Lu X, Zhao Sh, Feng Y. Vitrification of in vitro matured oocytes diminishes embryo development potential before but not after embryo genomic activation. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33(2):231-6. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10815-015-0637-5]
28. Braga DP, Setti AS, Figueira RC, De Castro Azevedo M, Iaconelli Jr A, Turco EG, et al. Freeze-all, oocyte vitrification, or fresh embryo transfer? Lessons from an egg-sharing donation program. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(3):615-22. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.05.004]
29. Cobo A, Coello A, Remohí J, Serrano J, De Los Santos JM, Meseguer M. Effect of oocyte vitrification on embryo quality: Time-lapse analysis and morphokinetic evaluation. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(3):491-7. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.024]
30. De Munck N, Santos-Ribeiro S, Stoop D, Van De Velde H, Verheyen G. Open versus closed oocyte vitrification in an oocyte donation programme: A prospective randomized sibling oocyte study. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(2):377-84. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/humrep/dev321]
31. Asa E, Tabatabaee R, Farrokhi A, Nejatbakhsh R. Relationship between meiotic spindles visualization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes in human oocytes. Anat Cell Biol. 2017;50(1):26-32. [Link] [DOI:10.5115/acb.2017.50.1.26]
32. Ciotti PM, Porcu E, Notarangelo L, Magrini O, Bazzocchi A, Venturoli S. Meiotic spindle recovery is faster in vitrification of human oocytes compared to slow freezing. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(6):2399-407. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.013]
33. Gomes CM, Silva CA, Acevedo N, Baracat E, Serafini P, Smith GD. Influence of vitrification on mouse metaphase II oocyte spindle dynamics and chromatin alignment. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(4):1396-404. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.08.025]
34. Pickering SJ, Braude PR, Johnson MH, Cant A, Currie J. Transient cooling to room temperature can cause irreversible disruption of the meiotic spindle in the human oocyte. Fertil Steril. 1990;54(1):102-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)53644-9]
35. Buderatska N, Gontar J, Ilyin I, Lavrinenko S, Petrushko M, Yurchuk T. Does human oocyte cryopreservation effect equally on embryo chromosome aneuploidy?. Cryobiology. 2020;93:33-6. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.cryobiol.2020.03.002]
36. Gu RH, Li ZC, Lang JW, Chen H, Feng Y, Guo S, et al. Vitrification of In vitro-matured Oocytes: Effects of meiotic spindle morphology on clinical outcome. Reprod Dev Med. 2020;4(1):18-24. [Link] [DOI:10.4103/2096-2924.281854]
37. Cobo A, Perez S, De Los Santos MJ, Zulategui J, Domingo J, Remohi J. Effect of different cryopreservation protocols on the metaphase II spindle in human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17(3):350-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60218-0]
38. Cobo A, Meseguer M, Remohí J, Pellicer A. Use of cryo-banked oocytes in an ovum donation programme: A prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(9):2239-46. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/humrep/deq146]
39. Tamura AN, Huang TT, Marikawa Y. Impact of vitrification on the meiotic spindle and components of the microtubule-organizing center in mouse mature oocytes. Biol Reprod. 2013;89(5):112:1-10. [Link] [DOI:10.1095/biolreprod.113.108167]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |