Detection of Mycoplasma salivarium Contamination in Cell Culture using PCR Method

Authors
1 Department of Microbiology, Karaj Branch of Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
2 Mycoplasma Referance Laboratory, Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Karaj, Iran
Abstract
Objective: Mycoplasma salivarium (M. salivarium) isone of the most common contaminants present in cell culture laboratories that cause undesirable effects on cell cultures. Thus, the identification and rapid diagnosis in controlling and prevention of this contaminant are important. The aim of this study is the detection of Mycoplasma salivarium contamination in cell culture using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method.
Methods: A 16S rRNA-based Mycoplasma genus and specific primer PCR method for M. salivarium was developed. The sensitivity and specificity of this method were determined. The PCR test was used after we extracted DNA from the cultured isolates.
Results: A total of 62 cell culture samples were sent to the Mycoplasma Reference Laboratory at Razi Institute, Karaj, Iran for detection of Mycoplasma contamination. A total of 42 (67.75%) out of 62 samples scored positive according to the Mycoplasma genus. From these 42 samples, 15 (35.72%) reacted positively with a clear band of 434 bp in the M. Salivarium-specific PCR method.
Conclusion: Due to the high percentage of M. salivarium contamination in cell cultures, we recommend aseptic conditions be used in the laboratory when working with cell cultures. The PCR method is a suitable and valuable tool for the detection of M. salivarium contamination in cell cultures with appropriate and specific primers. This PCR method can be processed in less than one day.

Keywords


 
 
[1]     Arai S, Harasawa R, Ohno T, Takeuchi M, Hikiji K, Sato S, Kobayashi N, Asada K, Takagi K, Lee IE, Kato K, Furudera T. "Japan Bioindustry Association (JBA) is Validating Standard Methods for the Detection of Mycoplasmas" 1992; Beijin 7th ICCC
[2]     Mirjalili A, Parmoor E, Moradi Bidhendi S, Sarkari B. Microbial contamination of cell cultures: a 2 years study. Biologicals 2005; 33(2): 81-5.
[3]     Rawadi G, Dussurget O. Advances in PCR-based detection of Mycoplasmas contaminating cell cultures. PCR Methods Appl 1995; 4(4): 199-208.‏
[4]     Uphoff CC, Brauer S, Grunicke D, Gignac SM, MacLeod RA, Quentmeier H, Steube K, Tümmler M, Voges M, Wagner B, Drexler HG. Sensitivity and specificity of five different Mycoplasma detection assays. Leukemia 1992; 6(4): 335-41.
[5]     Mardassi BB, Mohamed RB, Gueriri I, Boughattas S, Mlik B. Duplex PCR to differentiate between Mycoplasmasynoviae and Mycoplasmagallisepticum on the basis of conserved species-specific sequences of their hemagglutinin genes. J Clin Microbiol 2005; 43(2): 948-58.
[6]     Drexler HG, Uphoff CC. Mycoplasma contamination of cell cultures: Incidence, sources, effects, detection, elimination, prevention. Cytotechnology 2002; 39(2): 75-90.
[7]     Swayne DE, Glisson RJ, Jackwood MW, Pearson JE, Reed WM. A laboratory manual for the isolation and indntification of avian pathogens. 4th Edition, Washington: The American Association of pathologist, 1998; p: 74-80.
[8]     Engel LD, Kenny GE. Mycoplasma salivarium in human gingival sulci. J Periodontal Res 1970; 5(3): 163-71.
[9]     Tully JG. Current status of the mollicute flora of humans. Clin Infect Dis 1993; 17 Suppl 1: S2-9.
[10]  Yoshida T, Maeda S, Deguchi T, Ishiko H. Phylogeny-based rapid identification of Mycoplasmas and Ureaplasmas from urethritis patients. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40(1): 105-10.
[11]  Pourbakhsh SA, Shokri GR, Banani M, Elhamnia F, Ashtar A. Detection of Mycoplasma synoviae infection in broiler breeder farms of Tehran province using PCR and culture methods. Arch Razi Inst 2010; 65(2): 75-81.
[12]  van Kuppeveld FJ, van der Logt JT, Angulo AF, van Zoest MJ, Quint WG, Niesters HG, Galama JM, Melchers WJ. Genus-and species-specific identification of Mycoplasma by 16S rRNA amplification. Appl Environ Microbiol 1992; 58(8): 2606-15.
[13]  Timenetsky J, Santos LM, Buzinhani M, Mettifogo E. Detection of multiple Mycoplasma infection in cell cultures by PCR. Braz J Med Biol Res 2006; 39(7): 907-14.
[14]  Watanabe T. Biological and serological studies on oral Mycoplasma. Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ 1967; 14(4): 447-60.
[15]  McGarrity GJ, Vanaman V, Sarama J. Cytogenetic effects of mycoplasmal infection of cell cultures: a review. In Vitro 1984; 20(1): 1-18.
[16]  Wirth M, Berthold E, Grashoff M, Pfutzner H, Schubert U, Hauser H. Detection of mycoplasma contaminations by the polymerase chain reaction.Cytotechnology 1994; 16 :67-77.
[17]  Somerson NL, Cook MK. Suppression of rous sarcoma virus growth in tissue cultures by Mycoplasma orale. J Bacteriol 1965; 90: 534-40.
[18]  Ryan J. Understanding and Managing Cell Culture Contamination Corning, Inc. Technical Bulletin, Corning Life Sciences 2002; Available at: www.corning.com/lifesciences.
[19]  Razin S, Yogev D, Naot Y. Molecular biology and pathogenicity of Mycoplasmas. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 1998; 62(4): 1094-156.
[20]  Watanabe T, Matsuura M, Seto K. Enumeration, isolation, and species identification of mycoplasmas in saliva sampled from the normal and pathological human oral cavity and antibody response to an oral mycoplasma (Mycoplasma salivarium). J Clin Microbiol 1986; 23(6): 1034-8.
[21]  Lobo E, Chávez Y, Fernández C, Martinez S, Martinez A. Mycoplasma control in biopharmaccutical processing: Experience of Mycoplasma diagnostic incoba. 14 International congress of the international organization for myplas mology (IOM), Vienna, Austria 2002. Available at: http://vmutpp.vu-wien.ac.at/vuw/ fodok/suche.publikationen_suchergebnis
[22]  Harasawa R. Nested PCR: Application to the detection of Mycoplasmas. In: Razin S, Tully JG, (Editors). Molecular and Diagnostic Procedures in Mycoplasmology. London: Academic Press, 1995; p: 710-5.
[23]  Agarwal P, Searls DB. Can literature analysis identify innovation drivers in drug discovery? Nat Rev Drug Discov 2009; 8(11): 865-78.
Freshney RI. Culture of Animal Cells. Chapter 8, 5th Edition, New York: Wiley-Liss, 2005.