Preparation, Characterization and Biological Assessment of Polycaprolactone/Starch Composites for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications

Authors
1 M.Sc., Department of Biomaterial, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology (Iran Poly technique), Tehran, Iran
2 Associated Professor, Department of Biomaterial, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology (Iran Poly technique), Tehran, Iran
3 Associated Professor, Orthopedic Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
4 Associated Professor, Cell Culture and Tissue Engineering Lab, Iran Cell Bank, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran
5 Ph.D. Student, Department of Biomaterial, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology (Iran Poly technique), Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Objective: Biodegradable polycaprolactone/starch composites can be used for bone tissue engineering applications. The effect of the ratio of components on composite properties is of tremendous importance. Methods: Polycaprolactone/starch composite of 80/20 and 70/30 ratios were fabricated by dissolving them in chloroform followed by evaporation of the solvent. Results: The composites were characterized by fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Their bioactivity was evaluated by studying the apatite formation ability after immersing the specimens in simulated body fluid. The results of compressive test on samples showed that the composite’s modulus and strength approximated that of human trabecular bone. Mass loss in distilled water and starch degradation rate in PBS was evaluated, which showed that the starch ratio was effective in composite degradation. MTT analysis and alkaline phosphatase levels showed that this composite had no toxicity and could increase G-299 cell line osteoblastic activities. Conclusion: The increase in cellular osteoblastic activities and the ability for apatite formation on the composite surface, in addition to the polycaprolactone/starch samples' mechanical properties shows their capability to be used as substitutes for bone. Because this composite degradation rate is controlled by changing the starch ratio, it has the potential for use in bone tissue engineering applications. Samples that have a 70/30 ratio are considered optimal due to their enhanced cellular response and better mechanical properties.

Keywords


[1]     Dillow A, Lowman A. Biomimetic Materials And Design: Biointerfacial Strategies, Tissue Engineering And Targeted Drug Delivery. Philadelphia: CRC Press, 2002; p: 290-2.
[2]     Shalumon K, Aulekha KH, Chennazhi KP, Tamra H, Nair SV, Jayakumar R. Fabriation of Chitosan/poly(caprolacton) nanofibrous scaffold for bone and skin tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol 2011; 48(4): 571–6.
[3]     Chandra R, Rustgi R. Biodegradable polymers. Progr Polym Sci 1998; 23: 1273–335.
[4]  Okada M. Chemical syntheses of biodegradable polymers. Prog Polym Sci 2002; 27(1): 87-133.
[5]     Puppi D, Chiellini F, Piras AM, Chiellini E. Polymeric materials for bone and cartilage repair. Prog Polyme Sci 2010; 35(4): 403-40.
[6]     Hutmacher DW. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials 2000; 21(24): 2529-43.
[7]     Gunatillake PA, Adhikari R. Biodegradable synthetic polymers for tissue engineering. Eur Cells Mater 2003; 5: 1-16.
[8]     Mano JF, Sousa RA, Boesel LF, Neves NM, Reis RL. Bioinert, biodegradable and injectable polymeric matrix composites for hard tissue replacement: state of the art and recent developments. Comp Sci Tech 2004; 64(6): 789-817.
[9]     Nair LS, Laurencin CT. Biodegradable polymers as biomaterials. Prog Polym Sci 2007; 32(8-9): 762-98.
[10]  Woodruff MA, Hutmacher DW. The return of a forgotten polymer—Polycaprolactone in the 21st century. Prog Polym Sci 2011; 35(10): 1217-56.
[11]  Liu H, Xie F, Yu Long, Chen L, Li L. Thermal processing of starch-based polymers. Prog Polym Sci 2009; 34(12): 1348-68.
[12]  Santos MI, Unger RE, Sousa RA, Reis RL, Kirkpatrick CJ. Crosstalk between osteoblasts and endothelial cells co-cultured on a polycaprolactone-starch scaffold and the in vitro development of vascularizationn. Biomaterials 2009; 30(26): 4407-15.
[13]  Puppi D, Chiellini F, Piras AM, Chiellini E. Polymeric materials for bone and cartilage repair. Prog Polym Sci 2010: 35(4): 403-40.
[14]  Alves NM, Saiz-Arroyo C, Rodriguez-Perez MA, Reis RL, Mano JF. Microhardness of starch based biomaterials in simulated physiological conditions. Acta Biomater 2007; 3(1): 69-76.
[15]  Singh RP, Pandey JK, Rutot D, Degée P, Dubois P. Biodegradation of poly(epsilon-caprolactone)/starch blends and composites in composting and culture environments: the effect of compatibilization on the inherent biodegradability of the host polymer. Carbohydr Res 2003; 338(17): 1759-69.
[16]  Rosa DS,Lopes DR, Calil MRThermal properties and enzymatic degradation of blends of poly(ε-caprolactone) with starches. Polym Test 2005; 24(6): 756-61.
[17]  IshiakuUS, Pang KW, Lee WS, Mohd Ishak ZA. Mechanical properties and enzymic degradation of thermoplastic and granular sago starch filled poly(ε-caprolactone). Euro Pol J 2002; 38(2): 393-401.
[18]  Avella M, Errico ME, Laurienzo P, Martuscelli E, Raimo M, Rimedio R. Preparation and characterisation of compatibilised polycapro-lactone/starch composites. Polymer 2000; 41(10): 3875-81.
[19]  Su J, Chen L, Li L. Characterization of polycaprolactone and starch blends for potential application within the biomaterials field. Afr J Biotechnol 2012; 11(3): 694-701.
[20]  Park JB,LakesRS. Biomaterials: An Introduction.New York: Springer, 2007; p: 134-46.
[21]  Kokubo T, Takadama H. How useful is SBF in predicting in vivobone bioactivity? Biomaterials 2006; 27(15): 2907-15.
[22] CamposA, Marconcini JM, Martins-Franchetti SM, Mattoso LHC. The influence of UV-C irradiation on the properties of thermoplastic starch and polycaprolactone biocomposite with sisal bleached fibers. Polym Degrad Stab 2012; 97(10): 1948-55.
[23]  Wu CS. Physical properties and biodegradability of maleated-polycaprolactone/starch composite. Polym Degrad Stab 2003; 80(1): 127-34.
[24]  Wang J, Cheung MK, Mi Y. Miscibility and morphology in crystalline/amorphous blends of poly(caprolactone)/poly(4-vinylphenol) as studied by DSC, FTIR, and 13C solid state NMR. Polymer 2002; 43(4): 1357-64.
[25]  Liu H, Chaudhary D, Yusa SI, Tadé MO. Glycerol/ starch/ Na+- montmorillonite nano-composites: A XRD, FTIR, DSC and 1H NMR study. Carbohydr Polym 2011; 83(4): 1591-97.
[26] DuarteARC, Mano JF, Reis RL. Enzymatic degradation of 3D scaffolds of starch-poly-(ε-caprolactone) prepared by supercritical fluid technology. Polym Degrad Stab 2010; 95(10): 2110-7.
[27]  di Francoa CR, Cyrasa VP, Busalmen JP, Ruseckaite RA, Vázquez A. Degradation of polycaprolactone/starch blends and composites with sisal fibre. Polym Degrad Stab 2004; 86(10): 95-103.
[28]  Pan H, Zhao X, Darvell BW, Lu WW. Apatite-formation ability--predictor of "bioactivity"? Acta Biomater 2010; 6(11): 4181-8.
[29]  Yang S, Leong KF, Du Z, Chua CK. The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering.PartI. Traditional factors. Tissue Eng 2001; 7(6): 679-89.
[30]  Hutmacher DW, Schantz JT, Lam CX, Tan KC, Lim TC. State of the art and future directions of scaffold-based bone engineering from a biomaterials perspective. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2007; 1(4): 245-60.