Sucrose Effect on Follicular Survival Rate and Apoptosis Incidence in Rat Ovarian Tissue after Vitrification

Authors
Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Objective: the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of sucrose on follicular survival rate and the incidence of apoptosis in rat ovarian tissue following vitrification.
Methods: Ovaries of approximately 5-week-old female Wistar rats were divided randomly into three groups: control (non-vitrified), VI (Ethylene Glycol + Dimethyl Sulfoxide) and VII (EG + DMSO + 0.25 mol/lit sucrose). Vitrified-warmed samples were incubated for approximately 30 minutes and fixed in Bouin’s fixative. The samples were serially sectioned and stained either with H&E or immunohistochemistry kit of anti-active and a pro-caspase-3 kit.
Results: Data analysis showed that the rate of growing follicles that survived, with the exception of primordial follicles, was comparable between the vitrified-warmed and control samples. Morphologically healthy primordial follicles showed significant reductions in all vitrification groups compared to the control, however this rate was not significant between the vitrification groups. In comparison with healthy follicles, there were significantly more dead follicles in the vitrification groups than the control group. In addition the apoptotic follicles increased significantly after vitrification, with the exception of the antral follicles. Although the number of apoptotic follicles was similar between both vitrification groups, however there were significantly more pre-antral apoptotic follicles in the VII group compared to the VI and control groups.
Conclusion: According to these results, the presence or absence of sucrose has no significant effect on the preservation of primordial and primary follicles which are important for transplantation.

Keywords


[1]     Christopoulou C. Robert Boyle’s experiments on cold: A study of the role of chemical experiments. 6th International Conference on The History of Chemistry 2007; 423-431. Available at: http://www.euchems.eu/ fileadmin/user_upload/binaries/49_Christopoulou_tcm23-139407.pdf
[2]     Demeestere I, Moffa F, Peccatori F, Poirot C, Shalom-Paz E. Multiple approaches for individualized fertility protective therapy in cancer patients. Obstet Gynecol Int 2012; 2012: 961232.
[3]     Donnez J, Dolmans MM, Demylle D, Jadoul P, Pirard C, Squifflet J, Martinez-Madrid B, van Langendonckt A. Livebirth after orthotopic transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue. Lancet 2004; 364(9443): 1405-10.
[4]     Paynter SJ, Cooper A, Fuller BJ, Shaw RW. Cryopreservation of bovine ovarian tissue: structural normality of follicles after thawing and culture in vitro. Cryobiology 1999; 38(4): 301-9.
[6]     Baudot A, Courbiere B, Odagescu V, Salle B, Mazoyer C, Massardier J, Lornage J. Towards whole sheep ovary cryopreservation. Cryobiology 2007; 55(3): 236-48.
[7]      Borges EN, Silva RC, Futino DO, Rocha-Junior CM, Amorim CA, Báo SN, Lucci CM. Cryopreservation of swine ovarian tissue: effect of different cryoprotectants on the structural preservation of preantral follicle oocytes. Cryobiology 2009; 59(2): 195-200.
[13]  Fathi R, Valojerdi MR, Yazdi PE, Ebrahimi B, Alipour H, Hassani F. Development of 4-cell mouse embryos after re-vitrification. Cryobiology 2012; 64(1): 23-6.
[14]  Rezazadeh Valojerdi M, Eftekhari-Yazdi P, Karimian L, Hassani F, Movaghar B.  Vitrification versus slow freezing gives excellent survival, post warming embryo morphology and pregnancy outcomes for human cleaved embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet 2009; 26(6): 347-54.
[16]  Marsella T, Sena P, Xella S, La Marca A, Giulini S, De Pol A, Volpe A, Marzona L. Human ovarian tissue cryopreservation: effect of sucrose concentration on morphological features after thawing. Reprod Biomed Online 2008; 16(2): 257-67.
[19]  Gougeon A. Dynamics of follicular growth in the human: a model from preliminary results. Hum Reprod 1986; 1(2): 81-7.
[21]  Capacchietti G, Cecconi S, Gioia L, Turriani M. Effect of cryoprotectant agents on the potential development of sheep preantral follicles. Vet Res Commun 2004; 28 Suppl 1: 173-6.
[22]  Cecconi S, Capacchietti G, Russo V, Berardinelli P, Mattioli M, Barboni B. In vitro growth of preantral follicles isolated from cryopreserved ovine ovarian tissue. Biol Reprod 2004; 70(1): 12-7.
[23]  Santos RR, Rodrigues AP, Costa SH, Silva JR, Matos MH, Lucci CM, Báo SN, van den Hurk R, Figueiredo JR. Histological and ultrastructural analysis of cryopreserved sheep preantral follicles. Anim Reprod Sci 2006; 91(3-4): 249-63.
[24]  Santos RR, Tharasanit T, Figueiredo JR, van Haeften T, van den Hurk R. Preservation of caprine preantral follicle viability after cryopreservation in sucrose and ethylene glycol. Cell Tissue Res 2006; 325(3): 523-31.
[25]  Rodrigues AP, Amorim CA, Costa SH, Matos MH, Santos RR, Lucci CM, Báo SN, Ohashi OM, Figueiredo JR. Cryopreservation of caprine ovarian tissue using dimethylsulphoxide and propanediol. Anim Reprod Sci 2004; 84(1-2): 211-27.
[26]  Celestino JJ, dos Santos RR, Lopes CA, Martins FS, Matos MH, Melo MA, Báo SN, Rodrigues AP, Silva JR, de Figueiredo JR. Preservation of bovine preantral follicle viability and ultra-structure after cooling and freezing of ovarian tissue. Anim Reprod Sci 2008; 108(3-4): 309-18.
[28]  Bosch P, Hernandez-Fonseca HJ, Miller DM, Wininger JD, Massey JB, Lamb SV, Brackett BG.  Development of antral follicles in cryopreserved cat ovarian tissue transplanted to immunodeficient mice. Theriogenology 2004; 61(2-3): 581-94.
[29]  Fornari DC, Ribeiro RP, Streit D, Godoy LC, Neves PR, de Oliveira D, Sirol RN. Effect of cryoprotectants on the survival of cascudo preto (Rhinelepis aspera) embryos stored at -8°C. Zygote. 2011; 26:1-6. [Epub ahead of print]
[30]  Martinez-Alborcia MJ, Valverde A, Parrilla I, Vazquez JM, Martinez EA, Roca J. Detrimental effects of non-functional spermatozoa on the freezability of functional spermatozoa from boar ejaculate. PLoS One 2012; 7(5): e36550.
[31]  Liu Z, Foote RH. Osmotic effects on volume and motility of bull sperm exposed to membrane permeable and nonpermeable agents. Cryobiology 1998; 37(3): 207-18.
[33]  Silva JR, Báo SN, Lucci CM, Carvalho FC, Andrade ER, Ferreira MA, Figueiredo JR. Morphological and ultrastructural changes occurring during degeneration of goat preantral follicles preserved in vitro. Anim Reprod Sci 2001; 66(3-4): 209-23.
[34]  Schmidt KL, Ernst E, Byskov AG, Nyboe Andersen A, Yding Andersen C. Survival of primordial follicles following prolonged transportation of ovarian tissue prior to cryopreservation. Hum Reprod 2003; 18(12): 2654-9.
[35]  NewtonH, Fisher J, Arnold JRP, PeggDE, Faddy MJ, Gosden RG.  Permeation of human ovarian tissue with cryoprotective agents in preparation for cryopreservation. Hum Reprod 1998; 13(2): 376-80.
[37]  Elert, G. Viscosity. The Physics Hypertextbook. 2007; Available at: http://physics.info/viscosity/
[40]  Szurek EA, Eroglu A. Comparison and Avoidance of Toxicity of Penetrating Cryoprotectants. PLoS One 2011; 6(11): e27604.
[41]  Rebsdat S, Mayer D. Ethylene Glycol. Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Wiley-VCH 2000; Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14356007.a10_101/abstract
[42]  Roy KM. Sulfones and Sulfoxides. Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Wiley-VCH 2000; Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14356007.a25_487/abstract